SC bars construction work in SWM-failed states across the country

States that have missed the boat to formulate their respective solid waste management policies are going to have a harder payback this time.  On this Friday, a bench of Justice M B Lokur and Justice S Abdul Nazeer issued a strong writer order against these states and UTS.

What is there in this order?

The order sets the barricade around the upcoming and on-going construction works across these states and UTS which have failed to formulate their solid waste management (SWM) under the Solid Waste Management Rules 2016. These states are not allowed to commence their construction works until they codify their SWM policies.

How does it act on the states’ revenue?

It seems that states have been either delaying or chose to remain unresponsive after the release of the order back in the year 2016.
Now if states continue with the same limp demeanour, it will definitely bruise the revenue of the state from the real estate sector.
At present, it also takes a toll on the modus operandi of the very section as well.
What are the consequences that the real estate sector has to accost?
Sometimes well-meaning plans can bring undesired opposite results. We have seen this in the recent past when the country had to go through a severe cash crunch post demonetization when the mean objective was to eradicate the black money circulation in the credit flow. Common people had to suffer a lot and real estate was one worst-hit sector in those days.
SC has prohibited construction works in states and UT’s including Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chandigarh and Goa for their “pathetic” attitude in not framing proper policy on solid waste management without speculating the aftereffects.
“People have already spared enough strolling along with the free will of developers and realtors. After RERA came into the frame, they finally gained the relief of faith that their hard-earned money won’t get lost in the whirl as they permanently received a legal platform where they can lodge the complaint against the counterfeit activities of the real estate state holders. RERA also brought up the assurance that the project deliverance would be on-time along with the quality check. The recent order of the Apex Court is challenging the regulations of RERA in a straight line,” said Mr Mahesh Somani, Chairman – National RERA Committee, National Association of Realtors, India (east zone) and Vice President of RECA Kolkata.
“If the construction work gets halted somehow, how would the homebuyers get their project delivered within due time maintained under RERA rules where this time they can’t even blame the developers for the delay? The recent speculation would further add to their troubles, where states have chosen to stand by the order of the Supreme Court on its banning on construction activities in the states unless any solid waste management policy has been settled. This move of the states would certainly take a dig on the shield of buyer protection ACT RERA and buyers will be highly in doubt about the actual functionality of the ACT,”- added Mr Somani.
Of course, sanitization is crucial; states should definitely come up with a proper policy of the same. Meanwhile, banning of construction works happens to be a dry run for the effectiveness of the RERA regime. Let’s see how the states RERA Authorities deal with the situation.